Monday, January 31, 2011

Paper Reading #4: Cross Currents: Water Scarcity and Sustainable CHI

Comments:
Vince Kocks
Stuart Jones

Reference Information:
Title: Cross Currents: Water Scarcity and Sustainable CHI
Authors:  Tad Hirsch, Ken Anderson
Presentation Venue: CHI 2010 April 10-15, 2010 Atlanta, Georgia, USA
 
Summary:

This article is about a study in central New Mexico to find ways that new technologies, particularly personal water consumption devices, could assist in water conservation.  The study was done around three large cities, Albuquerque, Rio Rancho, and Sante Fe. This area provides a wide range of water use such as cities, agriculture, a semi-conductor plant, and Native American pueblos.

Interviews were conducted and showed that most people were very familiar with water conservation and recognized it as a priority. People expressed the purpose to their conservation in terms of responsibility and an ethical obligation.

There are several problems with New Mexico's water system. This was shown in the interviews that were conducted. Surface water is transferred based on "rights" and ground water is unregulated. The lack of regulation for groundwater causes over drafting which causes wells to run dry or can lead to aquifer collapse. Some other problems are extreme prices for water rights discourage farming, and the systems leaves room for cheaters. This also leads to mistrust when it comes to this subject.

This shows some things that can be considered in the CHI community. Sustainability is not a simple issue of just using less water, but is an entire system consumption.

Before personal consumption monitoring can be designed a definition of "consumption" must be recognized.  Is it enough to just keep track of the number of gallons that flow from a point? Or would it be better to account for the rate and means through which water is returned to it's source?

Even after how the system will keep track of water consumption, policy and planning must be thought of for the state. There are five distinct challenges associated with water sustainability planning and they are:
  • Understanding interactions between human use and hydrologic cycles is an ongoing challenge
  • Modeling and simulation technologies are opaque
  • Policy implications are indeterminate
  • Public participlation remains elusive
  • There is a need for greater enforcement, transparency, and benchmarking
Because of this study, designers are cautioned to not think of conservation as an intrinsic good, but rather to see that consumption activities are shaped by a variety of concerns. Sustainability is not a "one-size-gits-all" case, it may be different for each region. Environmental Resource decisions by individual actors and policy makers turn on information, communication, and deliberation - which makes this issue familiar to the CHI community.

Discussion:

This paper is discussing a very important issue, water scarcity. I think the author's decision to interview all of the different communities who use the water differently was very smart because it seems like it would make a water consumption system easier to design.

Based on the different things people care about and observe would lead to a system that works better for everyone and one that can trust. I know you can't please everybody so that's why I think they didn't talk about a specific design idea. They laid the foundation for further research to be conducted in this area.

However, they did show with their own research that one individual region shouldn't necessarily use the same conservation methods as another area. I thought this was a good idea because it included more factors rather than just "just use less water" to find a strong and stable fix to the problem.

Microblogs for Opening Skinner's Box

Reference Information:
                 Title: Opening Skinner's Box
                 Author:  Lauren Slater
                 Publisher: 2005, W.W. Norton                            & Company, Inc.

Chapter 1: Opening Skinner's Box

Summary:
This chapter introduces the idea of Skinner and his reputation. People think he is scary and the name is startling. Skinner's ideas are explained through a series of ideas involving animals and making them do things for food. The ideas have to do with free will and why we do certain things. 

The author begins studying Skinner by going to Harvard to get more information about him. She also finds one of his daughters who lets the author view Skinner's old house. The daughter compares Skinner to Darwin and says people are just threatened by his great ideas. 

Discussion: 
I thought the experiments with the animals was interesting. Especially how Skinner used the Pavlov experiment to further his experiments. His ideas are interesting and I'm looking forward to reading some more. 

Chapter 2:  Obscura 

Summary:
This chapter was about an experiment done by Stanley Milgram that was about obedience to authority. He wanted to see how many people would continously shock another person even if they got the impression that the shock could be lethal. People were interviewed that participated in the experiment to see the effects that it had on them.
 

Discussion:
This chapter gave me the chills kind of. It was very interesting to read and I just couldn't believe how many people were recorded that actually kept shocking people (65%?). 

Chapter 3: On Being Sane in Insane Places

Summary: 
David Rosenhan conducted a clever experiment which was to basically test the idea of physicatrics in medicine. He got some people including himself to go to the hospital and get admitted and then acted completely normal to see how long it took for them to recognized as normal. The same idea for this experiment was used by the author who goes to hospitals to see how things have changed. She is not admitted to any hospitals but is usually diagnosed and given pills. Later, in a conversation with Robert Spitzer, Spitzer says that he thinks that doctors just don't know when to say "I don't Know".

Discussion:
I enjoyed this chapter more than the others so far. I thought it was funny how the author says that the Rosenhan experiment is really hated in the field even after 40 years because of how it tries to discredit the idea. I thought it was interesting how the author tried to mimic the experiment and nobody had ever heard of this story before and the "thud" voice. The results were interesting to how many doctors prescribed medicine with nothing more than a 10 minute examination even if they were just "light" medical pills.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Paper Reading #3: Multi-lifespan information system design in post-conflict societies: an evolving project in Rwanda

Comments:


Reference Information:
Title: Multi-lifespan information system design in post-conflict societies: an evolving project in Rwanda
Authors: Batya Friedman, Tron Nilsen, Lisa Nathan, Robert Utter, Milli Lake, Mark Ring, Neil Carden Grey,     Zoe Kahn
Presentation Venue: CHI 2010 April 10-15, 2010 Atlanta, Georgia, USA


Summary:


Rwanda's Flag
The paper starts out by describing the problem that starts this research. In 1994 800,000 Rwandans were massacred in just 100 days. The transitional government that followed the genocide had three justice systems emerge, one of them being the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The ICTR was made to prosecute those who organized and masterminded the genocide.


49 video interviews were conducted to collect the experiences of the ICTR's judges, prosecutors, defense lawyers, investigators, interpreters, and the everyday staff. These videos are called the 'Tribunal Voices'. The goal of this was to address the social and technical challenges of creating an information system to preserver, manage, and support access and reuse of the ICTR's information.


This is relevant to HCI because of the intersection between information systems, design, and societal issues.
Multi-lifespan information systems are mentioned because it is important to not that peace building from a genocide is unlikely to be solved in a single human lifespan, so the information must be preserved efficiently.


This project made three important contributions. First, it supports the Rwandan people in their efforts to achieve justice. Second, it provides the HCI community with methods and approaches for undertaking information in post-conflict situations. Third, it it describes the first exploration of multi-lifespan information system design.

Discussion:


This was very interesting to read because I didn't know much about this subject. I think this is significant to the HCI community because of how they use HCI to help in pressing societal issues. It also uses digital material that the Rwandan disempowered population can access instead of in the form of a book which might be clearer to some people

I think the mention of multi-lifespan information systems is important because in the paper it is stressed that this project will possibly help contribute to the lasting peace of Rwanda by keeping this information managable for many human lifetimes to come.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Ethnography ideas

I'm just brainstorming here for the upcoming ethnography project. My ideas include different groups of people to observe that I think would be interesting for me to learn more about.

1) The first group that came to mind was the Core here at Texas A&M. This was slightly motivated by Dr. Hammond talking about the military during class but another part is we see core members everyday on campus and I've seen some interesting things that I would be curious to learn more about.

2) Another group of people that I believe would be interesting to study as a student would be a group of athletes. An influence to this decision is the many teams we have here at our university.

3) My next idea is a not so obvious one but one I've had an interest in for awhile. Professional gamers would be very interesting to learn more about. There are people that actually get paid to practice and compete in computer/console games. I'm not sure how hard that would be to access compared to my first 2 ideas but I can give it a shot.

I don't think my first 2 ideas are the greatest because they are very obvious. I know a lot is already known about these groups but I think it would be interesting to learn more from them as a student. Maybe I'll wake up in the morning with more ideas. I do however think my third idea could be pretty interesting.

Paper Reading #2: Edits & credits: exploring integration and attribution in online creative collaboration

Comments:
Ryan Kerbow
Vince Kocks

Reference Information:
Title:  Edits & credits: exploring integration and attribution in online creative collaboration
Authors: Kurt Luther, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Amy Bruckman
Presentation Venue: CHI 2010 April 10-15, 2010 Atlanta, Georgia, USA

 Summary:

   The most common reason people spend free time editing articles for online encyclopedias or open-source code is to increase one's status in the community. To establish a reputation attribution is essential. Attribution is the act of giving someone credit for his or her actions. This paper presents a qualitative study of attributions practices in online creative collaboration within the domain of Flash animation.

   The focus of the study was done on Newgrounds, who is the largest Flash animation portal on the web. One discusses one method of attribution on this portal by use of the website forums. Collaborative animation projects called "collabs" are put together which can have more than 50 artists on it at a time. A leader divides up the work and the result is published on the website.

  17 animators were interviewed who had experiences with collabs to find out more about this subject. Different methods are discussed in which the leader of the collab can choose to integrate and attribute works such as the "first come - first server" which guarantees your work will be attributed but this collab usually has many more artists, appeals to a certain niche, and is geared towards novice animators.

   Newgrounds has a multi-author system so many people can be credited as a "coauthor" on a single project. To become a coauthor the leader and 9 other contributors can be selected, there is a limit so some criteria must be upheld. This criteria is up to the leader of the collab.

   The findings from this study show the imprtance of integration and attribution in online creative collaboration. The collab leader is usually the person who takes this responsibility and nobody else. This is relevant because in communities such as Flickr and YouTube it is assumed that the uploader of the content is the creator of the content. Newgrounds stands apart by offering its multi-authoring system. This is important because as online creative collaboration becomes more widespread, support for collaborative authorship should grow. This study points to the need to understand, and design for, notions of authorship, ownership, and attribution that are rapidly evolving. Flash animation provides a good example of this.

Discussion: 

  This was an interesting paper to read and wasn't really what I was expecting. The author says it's important in different online communities to have a solid reputation so people will know and respect you and your work. This is done by being attributed for your work through whatever you're doing. The Newgrounds is a good example of this because there are a ton of users and different people creating work collaboratively. This causes the problem of crediting several authors for one piece of work. This sounds weird but just think of the sites such as YouTube who only credit one user for the uploaded video even if there are several authors. I think it is important that we evolve our standards as more collaborative work is starting to become available over the internet.

Microblogs for HCI Remixed

Reference Information:
                 Title: HCI Remixed
                 Author: Thomas Erickson and David W. McDonald
                 Publisher: 2008, Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Chapter 1: My Vision Isn't My Vision: Making a Career Out of Getting Back to Where I Started


Summary: 
A music major in the 70's who had no intentions of using computers was introduced to a digital music machine made by the NRC. The machine was mainly a HCI project with technologically naive users in mind when the it was being designed. The author loved the design and idea and has been trying to get things back to how he started his career.

Discussion:
I think in this essay the author is indirectly saying things are more complicated than they need to be in our current time. The story in general though is cool because he had no intentions of doing anything with computers but was shown that pretty much no matter what you do as a career that computers can be involved. So, now he spends his time trying to get back to where he started, which is think is the simplicity of the music machine.

Chapter 4: Drawing on SketchPad: Reflections on Computer Science and HCI 

Summary:
Sutherland's paper about SketchPad helps answer the question "why should HCI belong in a computer science program?" Besides many of the technical aspects of SketchPad, it anticipated over fifty years ago many of the programming ideas that are still with us today. The Sutherland paper says that HCI belongs in computer science because "the needs of innovative interfaces drive forward the science of computing". There is still a lot of work that can be done with computing systems designed as tools for experts.

Discussion:
The SketchPad is a good general example on how HCI is related to computer science. We can relate to the SketchPad paper on most of the projects we take part in today. I feel all of the matters discussed are still very relevant.

Chapter 5: The Mouse, the Demo, and the Big Idea
Summary:
This paper was about Doug Englebart's oNLine System (NLS) demo video and it's impact. This demo is often described as the "mother of all demos". Engelbart's research was based on augmenting human intellect with the computer mouse. This demo showed that the state of the art today is not unlike the one Englebart described, we have display editing, view control, collaborative remote authoring tools, linking, and object addressing.

Discussion:
I feel that most of this paper was about the author being inspired from the demo of the mouse. It made him realize based on his experience at MIT how important it was. He said that a great demonstration is not hype, but proof.


Chapter 18: Observing Collaboration: Group-Centered
 
Summary:
This chapter was about collaborating in the work-place. Research was done to see the tenancies of people while working together under certain conditions. One case was using a whiteboard or using a table. Different things were observed for each case.  From this research we can figure out ways to make things more efficient.

Discussion:
This was an interesting chapter because it involved technology that promotes collaboration. I think it's very important in terms of efficiency. The last paragraph in the chapter sticks out to me because the author says human factors relevant to collaboration will have a long "shelf life" and will be useful for a long time because people's collaborative practices today are generally the same as they were seventeen years ago. 

Chapter 20: Taking Articulation Work Seriously
Summary:
This paper could be the emergence of computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) as an area of research. They defined CSCE as "an endeavor to understand the nature and requirements of cooperative work with the objective of designing computer based technologies for cooperative work environments". Mutual dependence among the people who need to cooperate  and work together is whats called 'articulation work'. All work is socially situated and involves interaction and coordination.

Discussion:
This chapter highlighted the existence of CSCW as a viable and important research area. This goes hand in hand with the last chapter I read describing how technology can help collaboration and be more efficient.

Chapter 23: Video, Toys, and Beyond Being There
 
Summary:
Computer-mediated communication is described as a crutches for communication and physical contact is described as the shoes, the shoes being what we are more used to. Many things however can be used as "shoes" and enhance human performance rather than mimic it. Computers play an important role in the human experience and our goal in computational design should be to enhance the human experience intellectually and emotionally.

Discussion:
This chapter had good real world examples to help understand better. Things like google allowed the professor to throw out broad concepts because he knew most of his students would google it and ask him questions. He also mentioned the Lily doll who played a big role in interaction between his mother and daughter. It enhanced the human experience greatly and that should be the goal of computational design.

Chapter 24: A Simulated Listening Typewrite: John Gould Plays Wizard of Oz

Summary:
When speech recognition was first being researched,, John Gould used "The Wizard of Oz" method to help evaluate new technology. The method was to use a hidden human that would manipulate a computer interface that was under evaluation to see how it worked out. This simulation is still used today but most studies draw conclusions after much less exposure time to subjects.

Discussion:
This was interesting to read about because it is still applied to day according this paper. This seemed like an effective way to start this research because maybe at the time of the method's creation  they didn't have the technology to efficiently test the computer interface.

Chapter 25: Seeing the Hole in Space

Summary:
 The hole in space is an art scuplture type experiment that was done in 1980 to the people walking by Lincoln Center in New York and those in Century City in Los Angelas. These people were projected in store-front windows using projectors. These people could see, hear, and speak with each other.   

Chapter 26: Edward Tufte's 1 + 1 = 3

Summary:
The 1 + 1 = 3 comes from Edward Tufte saying that if you draw 2 lines you get negative space between the lines which adds another factor. The author gives an example about elevator buttons that illustrate 1 + 1 = 3 and says that the third element added is that the user has to parse, understand, then choose a button. This isn't good and he gives a couple ways to fix it through design. The point was to show that design proplems can be full of presentation clutter that confuses and complicates interaction.


Discussion:
 Many designs today still lack what this article was talking about. I think it is totally true that a lot of design add extra, unseen factors that influence how we use certain things today that aren't necessary.

Chapter 27: Typographic Space: A Fusion of Design and Technology

Summary:
This research area started with a paper that describes a Typographic Space system which allowed the user to lay out text in a three dimensional area  and to apply other basic  typographic attributes.This system opened up many other possibilities.  A new research domain emerged called kinetic typography. This domain is typography with motion as a design variable. The paper goes on to discuss different things that could be successful conveyed through this kind of typography.

Chapter 28: Making Sense of Sense Making

Summary:
The paper being discussed challenges critical assumptions about the functions of computers. Two claims were made that are still relevant. The first is computers are mainly sued for passive storage of information but this type of information is not particularly useful. The second was computers aren't very good at the important process of making sense of the information that is encountered. The first claim is because to Kidd, information is only useful during the act of informing. The second claim about sense making is perceptual and spatial processes are crucial and  AI won't help. It is vital to address Kidd's main questions of how new information is processed and what is the value of stored information.

Chapter 34: Revisiting an Ethnocritical Approach to HCI: Verbal Privilege and Translation

Summary:
This paper is based on Arthur Krupat's book, Ethnocriticism: Ethnography, History, Literature. The author rights that the principles of multiculturalism, polyvocal, and heterogeneity to relate to his design methods and developing. He modified Krupat's approaches to better understand and develop questions to help him think through the diverse and troubling choices he faced as an HCI worker.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

On Computers

Comments:
Miguel Alex Cardenas
Cindy Skach

Title: The Complete Works of Aristotle - "On Plants"
Editor: Jonathan Barnes


Summary:
This paper was written to figure out if plants have souls. Aristotle says plants desire food, which leads to other things such as sensations. Because they can desire it leads to things like joy and sadness. It was said that joy and sadness is represented by the falling of their leaves. Aristotle then goes on to analyze plant traits such as their ability to sleep and wake. Many more things are compared to make Aristotle think plants only have partial souls.
Aristotle


Discussion:
This is an interesting paper because it can be compared to computers as well (hence the title "On Computers"). Aristotle goes through all of the characteristics of a plant that sound humanly, what about computers? This could relate to the idea of the Chinese Room idea. The computer in this idea is able to trick a human into thinking it is another Chinese person and not a computer. This is done with the ability to communicate.  This is interesting because the more stuff we make computers do, one thing that comes to mind is robots, it seems like they get more humanly, when infact they are just hardware and software designed by humans. Reading this made me think of Walle. Even though I think that computers in no way have a soul it is cool to compare all of the similarities with Aristotles ideas. Maybe he would change his opinion if he saw the world today.